Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0865

reference
904-tree-1
name
0865
tree-preservation-order

undefined

904-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040096 50.860689)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040039 50.860683,-1.040042 50.860694,-1.040050 50.860704,-1.040062 50.860712,-1.040078 50.860718,-1.040095 50.860719,-1.040113 50.860718,-1.040129 50.860713,-1.040141 50.860705,-1.040150 50.860695,-1.040153 50.860684,-1.040150 50.860673,-1.040142 50.860663,-1.040130 50.860655,-1.040114 50.860649,-1.040097 50.860647,-1.040079 50.860649,-1.040063 50.860654,-1.040050 50.860662,-1.040042 50.860672,-1.040039 50.860683)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL